#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 how to
#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 trial
#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 plus

I use Lightroom for everything else, and 100% of images I display. I use Photoshop for speciality stuff like cropping and displaying tests on the blog. I got used to that difference very quickly, and have never looked back. You have to do that in the actual effect panel itself. You cannot create an effect and the change the blend of the later or the intensity. Lightroom has all the key tools in what is effectively a layered fashion, but it does not do layers. Lightroom is exemplary at cataloging and its editing is very powerful as well.

#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 plus

So long as you keep paying.ДЄdobe developed Lightroom less than a decade ago (Photoshop is a lot older than that) in order to address the enthusiast and consumer market, plus to create a world-class photo cataloging system, which they did. Today, 10 bucks a month gets you both Lightroom and Photoshop and upgrades are free forever. The results are pretty magnificent of course, but the tool was very expensive once. When you save a layered file, you are saving not just the settings, but layer upon layer of physical pixels. The key thing to understand about Photoshop is that the pixels on each layer physically exist.

#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 how to

It has the ability to edit in many different color spaces, to edit on layers, to use smart layers, where you can go back and change settings on 3rd party tools that know how to live in a smart layer, and so on. ДЄdobe started with Photoshop, which was from the start a fairly powerful editor. Well, you need to understand the two streams of development Adobe has going. I was under the impression that Lightroom's big advantage over Elements was photo handling and that it wasn't really any better an editor than Elements.

#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 trial

I'm downloading a 30 day trial of Lightroom 5 as I'm typing this.

YMMV of course, but I hope you look at Lightroom seriously. There are dozens of books and hundreds of tutorials on Youtube forВ Lightroom. This is pretty much the gold standard for amateurs and as a part of a larger suite of tools for enthusiasts and professionals. If you are thinking about spending 100 bucks on Elements, then allow me to urge you to consider Lightroom for 150 bucks. It is a truism that you get what you pay for, and if you want to pay nothing, then expect to put in some serious sweat equity in getting yourself up to speed on how to make the best use of it. it is not exactly supported with tutorials etc as are all the Adobe products. It looks to me like there is a heck of a lot more to Gimp than there is Elements and from reading online about the two, I get the same impression. Is there anything that PS Elements will do that Gimp won't do? I downloaded a 30 day trial of Elements and also Gimp. I'm new to digital photography and don't know a lot about editing software.